• Before making a single edit, Tropedia EXPECTS our site policy and manual of style to be followed. Failure to do so may result in deletion of contributions and blocks of users who refuse to learn to do so. Our policies can be reviewed here.
  • All images MUST now have proper attribution, those who neglect to assign at least the "fair use" licensing to an image may have it deleted. All new pages should use the preloadable templates feature on the edit page to add the appropriate basic page markup. Pages that don't do this will be subject to deletion, with or without explanation.
  • All new trope pages will be made with the "Trope Workshop" found on the "Troper Tools" menu and worked on until they have at least three examples. The Trope workshop specific templates can then be removed and it will be regarded as a regular trope page after being moved to the Main namespace. THIS SHOULD BE WORKING NOW, REPORT ANY ISSUES TO Janna2000, SelfCloak or RRabbit42. DON'T MAKE PAGES MANUALLY UNLESS A TEMPLATE IS BROKEN, AND REPORT IT THAT IS THE CASE. PAGES WILL BE DELETED OTHERWISE IF THEY ARE MISSING BASIC MARKUP.


WikEd fancyquotes.pngQuotesBug-silk.pngHeadscratchersIcons-mini-icon extension.gifPlaying WithUseful NotesMagnifier.pngAnalysisPhoto link.pngImage LinksHaiku-wide-icon.pngHaikuLaconic

It seems that there is a fine line between character development and and character derailment. Generally defined by whether or not we "like" the change. Examples:

  • Ben 10: Alien Force
    • People thought the "new ben" was too mature compared to his 10 year old predecessor. I think it was reasonable that, after four years of living a "normal life" you'd be thrusted into a situation where one of your loved ones are missing/endanger so you have to assume your super form, one might become more serious in light of that fact.
  • Sonic the Hedgehog
    • People praising Sonic Colors for rerailing his classic-esque characterization (wise cracking jokes etc.). Yet isn't modern Sonic supposed to be older? So his lack of wise cracking in the post Adventure era could be seen as character development.
      • In the first example, it's no so much that he matured as it was that he now had no personality at all. With the latter, Sonic's attitude was part of his appeal; just because it changing is plausible doesn't mean it's a good idea.
      • OP here, but because of it's "plausibility" shouldn't it be considered development as opposed to derailment? Regardless if it's a good idea or not?