Tropedia

  • All unique and most-recently-edited pages, images and templates from Original Tropes and The True Tropes wikis have been copied to this wiki. The two source wikis have been redirected to this wiki. Please see the FAQ on the merge for more.

READ MORE

Tropedia
WikEd fancyquotesQuotesBug-silkHeadscratchersIcons-mini-icon extensionPlaying WithUseful NotesMagnifierAnalysisPhoto linkImage LinksHaiku-wide-iconHaikuLaconic

Two Negative Premises:[]

If A is not B, and B is not C, then A is C. This is always invalid logic (although it may happen to be true), as it is not possible to make a valid conclusion from two negative premises; logic is not arithmetic. This is a fallacy because simply identifying what something isn't doesn't identify what it is.
Cquote1

 No Jews are Muslims.

No Muslims are Christians.

Therefore Jews are Christians.

Cquote2


Cquote1

 No dogs are reptiles.

No reptiles are magenta.

Dogs are magenta.

Cquote2


Cquote1

 No dogs are reptiles.

No reptiles shoot lasers out of their eyes.

Dogs shoot lasers out of their eyes.

Cquote2


Well, how about:

Cquote1

 No crow is a stone.

No stone has wings.

Therefore, crows have wings.

Cquote2

Which could just as easily be:

Cquote1

 No dog is a stone.

No stone has wings.

Therefore, dogs have wings.
 

Cquote2